Skip to content

Case study Web Copy

Putting buyers’ problems first on rtCamp’s enterprise WordPress pages

I rewrote rtCamp’s enterprise WordPress page twice. In November 2025, I sorted it into 9 pillars and opened it on a claim to be the leading agency.

Read the live page

Client
rtCamp
Role
Content Strategist / Copywriter / Technical Writer
Byline
Ghostwritten
Year
November 2025 to June 2026
Disciplines
Customer research, Messaging, SME review

Proof at a glance

What the live page still does, counted


I lost access to rtCamp’s analytics and CRM when I left, so every number here is one a reader can check.

  • 3

    pages live in 3 days

    January 14 to 16, 2026

  • 8

    buyers’ problems

    ahead of rtCamp’s stats and partner badges

  • 11

    engineering practices

    one answering each problem, further down the page

  • ~9%

    fewer words

    than my November version

The problem

My November version put the problems inside 9 pillars

Then Marketing and Sales passed on what they were hearing from prospects, and I watched Microsoft Clarity recordings of its visitors. Those recordings showed me people leaving at the hero and right after it.

The page I had written

Nine pillars, and the problem buried inside each one

Before I rewrote the page, it opened by telling you NASA, Meta, the White House, and over 40% of the web trusted WordPress.

Up top, my headline read “The leading agency for Enterprise WordPress development,” and the line under it called rtCamp award-winning.

If you kept scrolling, you’d reach the 9 pillars I’d written, each with a paragraph on the challenge and a list of solutions.

That meant a CTO had to read the whole framework before spotting the part about them.

After I published the November version, I watched Microsoft Clarity recordings of visitors moving through it.

I relied on the average across many sessions, since that gives a good overview of how an audience behaves. People lingered on one part of the page. Others went looking for an answer they never found and gave up.

Some left as soon as they reached the hero. Plenty more scrolled past it and left once they reached the first section, which told me something had to be done there.

Others made it all the way down to the CTA and dropped off there.

Marketing and Sales told me how their conversations with potential clients were going. Sales also told me what they wanted to see on the page, since they talked to those clients more than anyone and knew what sells and what attracts them.

Pillars
9
Delivery stages
7
Words
about 3,275

The rewrite

I kept the material and changed the order

Where on this page would a CTO find their own problem?

Back in November, I couldn’t see how people would move through the page. Clarity showed me afterward.

Tightening my own 9 pillars would’ve been the quicker job. In the rewrite, the 8 problems come straight after the hero and the row of customer logos.

My November version, then My January rewrite

Opening
My November version Opened with a headline about rtCamp My January rewrite Opened with 3 outcomes, one each for the site, the compliance team, and the marketing team
Problems
My November version Kept each problem inside one of 9 pillars My January rewrite Gave 8 problems a section of their own, each written as a scene from the reader’s week
Answers
My November version Answered each problem with a list of solutions My January rewrite Answered them in a later section of 11 practices, each naming how rtCamp does the work
Stats and badges
My November version Showed stats and badges near the top My January rewrite Moved them after the problems
Delivery
My November version Laid out 7 delivery stages My January rewrite Laid out 8, running past launch into training, handover, and ongoing partnership
Length
My November version Ran about 3,275 words My January rewrite Ran about 2,996 words

The four pieces

One piece for each question a buyer asks

Around the enterprise page, I wrote 3 more pieces for the same buyers, aimed at different points in their decision.

rtCamp wanted to own the enterprise WordPress keyword, so the page stayed a work in progress for as long as I was there, with the phrase in the headline of both my versions.

The Content Marketing Lead assignment on rtCamp’s careers site still gives candidates the job of planning content that gets “Enterprise WordPress Development” into the top 3.

Live in 3 days
January 14 to 16, 2026

The work

A rewrite in January, and 3 more pieces for the same buyers

So I rewrote it again, and the new version went live in January 2026.

How it was written

The reader’s week, then the engineering

  1. Putting the reader inside each problem

    You’ve probably filled in a contact form and never heard back. On the other side of that form, it’s one of the 8 problems, and Sales finds out about the missing lead days later.

    Another was a site that crashes exactly when everyone shows up.

    Throughout, I talk to the reader in the second person, the way you’d describe a bad week to a colleague, and close on what it costs them. I opened the traffic one on “Election night. Product launch. Breaking news.”

  2. Matching each problem to an engineering answer

    Further down the page, I laid out 11 practices describing how rtCamp’s engineers handle those 8 problems.

    Integrations is the one I’d show a developer, because rtCamp’s developers plan those around API rate limits, timeouts, and outages. Transactions wait in a queue when the system on the other end fails, so no data gets lost.

    With access, I explained single sign-on by what it does on someone’s last day. Their CMS access stops the moment the company switches off their account, and nobody has to clean up after them.

    Each problem, and its practice

    The site goes down during a traffic spike
    Code built for the site’s traffic patterns, on hosting that scales
    Compliance asks for controls the setup doesn’t have
    Security and compliance work the compliance team can check
    Marketing installs plugins IT never sees
    A review of every extension before it’s deployed
    Integrations drop data quietly
    Integrations built for rate limits, timeouts, and outages
    Marketing waits on developers
    Block templates the content team controls
    Anyone can edit or publish anything
    Roles, approval workflows, audit logs, and single sign-on
    Translations travel by spreadsheet
    Content that goes to the translation system and comes back intact
    Releases keep breaking the site
    Automated tests on each commit, and deploys without downtime
    Several of the above
    Architecture reviewed before code, and accessibility from the first build
  3. Writing the explainer for readers who aren’t ready to talk to Sales

    Some buyers land on the enterprise page too early. They’re still figuring out what an enterprise WordPress build involves, and a list of practices won’t help them yet.

    That’s who the enterprise WordPress explainer is for. It went live the next day.

    I based it on the idea that enterprise websites are business systems “that happen to have a frontend.” An iceberg illustration shows the part a visitor never sees.

    Then I walked them through 8 parts of an enterprise build, beginning with teams that publish in parallel and ending on brand sites that share one codebase.

    At the end, I left them a 7-item checklist. Check 3 or more and you’re in enterprise territory.

    rtCamp published it under Aviral Mittal’s name and credits me for contributions and updates. I wrote most of it, and Aviral edited it.

  4. Why WordPress at all, answered in December

    Six weeks earlier, I’d already written for buyers further back in their decision, who hadn’t settled on WordPress yet.

    That became my ecosystems article, which went up on December 5, 2025, with my name on it and Aviral as editor.

    To take apart the idea that WordPress is “just a blogging platform,” I used NASA, which runs its site on WordPress and stayed up through the 2024 eclipse traffic.

  5. The custom development page went first, by a day

    I’d written it to the same plan. The problems lead, and the answers follow them.

    On the custom development page, I also told buyers that most business sites don’t need headless WordPress. I called it “over-prescribed by agencies looking to inflate project scope,” and that’s still my view.

    Who checked the pages

    Edit and review
    Aviral Mittal, on the explainer and the enterprise page
    Review
    Project Delivery and Sales, on some of the pieces
    Sources
    Me, on the figures in the explainer

What the rewrite had to keep

The settings I could not change

A service page with a keyword to win, an audience Sales named, and a reviewer.

page
rtcamp.com/enterprise-wordpress-development/
keyword
enterprise WordPress development
readers
CMOs, CTOs, digital directors, product owners
job
service page ending in a call with a strategist
kept
client logos, partner badges, case studies, delivery stages, FAQ
review
Aviral Mittal, plus Project Delivery and Sales on some pieces
live
January 15, 2026 confirmed on the capture

What happened

rtCamp sends writing applicants to a doc I helped shape

Now a CTO meets those 8 problems before rtCamp’s stats block and partner badges, with an engineering answer to each one further down.

The findings

Where the work turned up after I left

If you apply to write for rtCamp today, the brief you get points to “our editorial standards,” which I helped refine.

Editorial standards
I count 7 of rtCamp’s 15 hiring assignments linking the editorial standards I helped refine. Counted across all 15 assignments on 2026-09-18.
A brief built on my rewrite
Two writing assignments want an article with my ecosystems piece’s exact title, for the audience I wrote it for. The WordPress Content Writer and Technical Content Writer (B2B/Agency) roles.
The order held
Three months after I left, the live page still puts the 8 problems ahead of the stats block. Its last update is dated June 2, 2026, 17 days before I finished at rtCamp.

Two of those, for the WordPress Content Writer and Technical Content Writer (B2B/Agency) roles, want an article with my ecosystems piece’s exact title, written for CMOs, CTOs, digital directors, and product owners.

They also ask for a plan that sends traffic to the enterprise page. So a writer applying there today gets standards I helped refine and a brief built around my rewrite.

What this page can’t show you

  • Traffic, rankings, leads, or deals. I lost access to rtCamp’s analytics and CRM when I left.
  • The Clarity recordings. They stayed in rtCamp’s account.
  • A byline on the enterprise page. rtCamp’s service pages don’t have bylines, and the explainer’s author line names Aviral.
  • Links from other sites. I searched for links to both pages from outside rtCamp and found none.

The explainer

The part of an enterprise site a visitor never sees


Enterprise websites are business systems that happen to have a frontend.

  • January 2026 The iceberg near the top of the explainer. Source: rtCamp

Working together

Let them say it.

His research was thorough and well-grounded, and he was equally strong on the review side, helping us run peer reviews that raised the overall quality of our content.

Franklin Fernandes — Senior Marketing Manager, rtCamp

Specific Attributable Verified

Their own words, cut only for length and never rewritten.

Then and now

Three months after I left, it still reads in that order

I went back into the enterprise page in April 2026 and again in June. Its last update is dated June 2, 17 days before I finished at rtCamp, so the version live today is mine.

In September 2026, the WordPress migration service lists my ecosystems article as one of its 3 resources.

What I got wrong

The link I left out, and the sentences I’d fix

Scroll to the bottom of the enterprise page and you’ll find 3 guides from rtCamp’s playbook. The explainer isn’t one of them.

So a CTO who wasn’t ready to talk yet had no route from that page to the one I’d written for them. Internal linking was my call, so that one’s on me. My April and June edits missed it too.

In the explainer, I wrote that private sector websites in the EU must meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA under the European Accessibility Act.

The act’s own text covers specific products and services such as e-commerce and consumer banking. It exempts micro-enterprises that provide services.

Putting those 8 problems first meant going through the teams’ records and taking a second go at my November version.

Now a CTO sees their own week on that page before any of rtCamp’s partner badges.

If you’re rewriting the copy for your product, list every issue it mentions before you touch a sentence. Then scroll down and see how far a reader gets before meeting one.

Explainer FAQ
  • Total cost of ownership drops 40–70% against proprietary platforms.
  • No source, and my ecosystems article says up to 40%, with a WordPress VIP study linked.
Explainer, performance
  • Visitors expect a page to load in under 2 seconds.
  • No source.
Stats block
  • 300+ projects delivered.
  • The hero says 500+ projects, and further down the page pairs 500+ projects with 300+ migrations, so this is the migration count under the wrong label. My January version labelled it Migrations to WordPress.
Core contributions
  • 34+ and 30+ consecutive releases with core contributions.
  • Two numbers for the same streak.

Four things I would fix:

Sources and credits

These are the versions I used, if you want to check my work

rtCamp updated my ecosystems article in August 2026, after I left, so the January capture shows what I published.